The Relationship between the Old Testament and the New Testament

  Sponsor: David Stark

The earliest Jesus movement's thought and literature took shape within the context of canon consciousness. This consciousness was not primarily an awareness of a canonical list(s) but an awareness of authoritative traditions.

One such tradition is that of Israel's Scriptures as interpreted in a Second Temple context. Another is how this scriptural tradition shapes the movement's own canonical kerygma that proclaims Jesus as Messiah. This kerygma then also sets the framework for the movement's interaction with Israel's Scriptures and the formation of the New Testament.

Together, these traditions shape (a) assessments of which texts were canonical and (b) the relationship(s) canonical texts and testaments have to each other. These traditions even shape the content of newer literature not broadly judged canonical (i.e., New Testament apocrypha). And their combination has continued influencing readers of canonical texts in subsequent centuries, including how readers understand the relationship between Christian Scripture's two testaments.

Therefore, this group explores how canon-consciousness manifests itself in Israel's Scriptures, the New Testament, and the earliest Christian writers (i.e., apologists and earlier), as well as this consciousness's ongoing hermeneutical implications for modern interpreters. Proposals are welcome but should avoid duplicating topics the group has already covered. To propose a paper, please use the SBL proposal system or email proposals to David Stark at [email protected]. Paper proposals are due by March 4, 2026.

To join the group's mailing list, please register at jdavidstark.com/ibr.

Saturday, November 21

1:00–3:00 PM

Presiding: J. David Stark

J. David Stark (Faulkner University): Introduction and Welcome (5 minutes)

George H. Guthrie (Regent College): “The ‘Christ Frame’ and Canon Consciousness: The Hermeneutic of Hebrews at 2:12–13” (20 minutes)

Megan DeVore (Colorado Christian University): “In Pigment and Stone: Early Christian Canon Consciousness and Visual Production” (20 minutes)

Tony Burke (York University): “Canon Consciousness in Early Christian Apocrypha” (20 minutes)

Keith Stanglin (Center for Christian Studies), respondent (25 minutes)

Discussion (30 minutes)